<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Underwood on Digital Marketing &#38;&#160;Online&#160;Strategy &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveunderwood.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveunderwood.com</link>
	<description>A UK perspective on search engine marketing, web analytics, social media &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymise your internet browsing</title>
		<link>http://daveunderwood.com/2011-08-10/anonymise-your-internet-browsing/</link>
		<comments>http://daveunderwood.com/2011-08-10/anonymise-your-internet-browsing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Underwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[future trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tor project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vidalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vidalia project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveunderwood.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Last updated: 10-August-2010) I&#8217;ve always thought the Tor Project (free internet anonymising service) was a worthwhile initiative. But the idea of having to run a Tor server somewhere seemed like a lot of effort. And I thought putting all my traffic through Tor would probably mean slow internet &#038; possibly some internet services not working [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>(Last updated: 10-August-2010)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought the <a href="https://www.torproject.org/">Tor Project</a> (free internet anonymising service) was a worthwhile initiative. But the idea of having to run a Tor server somewhere seemed like a lot of effort. And I thought putting all my traffic through Tor would probably mean slow internet &#038; possibly some internet services not working properly.</p>
<p>The Vidalia Project is a step in the right direction. You simply install the Vidalia bundle which includes Tor, install a &#8216;Tor button&#8217; in your browser and &#8211; pow! &#8211; you have an &#8216;anonymise my internet right now&#8217; button.</p>
<p><strong>Download Vidalia</strong>: <a href="https://www.torproject.org/projects/vidalia.html.en">https://www.torproject.org/projects/vidalia.html.en</a></p>
<p>The &#8216;Tor button&#8217; is reasonably straightforward. Note that right now the Firefox &#8216;enable Tor&#8217; button extension that comes with the bundle will not work with Firefox 5. You&#8217;ll have to go get it here: <a href="https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbutton/torbutton-current.xpi">https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbutton/torbutton-current.xpi</a></p>
<p><strong>Google Chrome</strong>: There isn&#8217;t a Chrome &#8216;Tor button&#8217; extension yet but the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5614732/create-a-tor-button-in-chrome-for-on+demand-anonymous-browsing">instructions for setting one up</a> are super super easy.</p>
<p>It should be noted that internet <em>is</em> slow through Tor, and by default things like YouTube are blocked through Tor because of the personal information that can be passed through Flash. I guess the point here is you don&#8217;t really need Tor enabled for things like watching YouTube videos.</p>
<p>(Hat tip to Lifehacker whose <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5825746/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-internet-snooping-bill-and-what-you-can-do-about-it">What You Need to Know About the Internet Snooping Bill</a> post first got me onto the Vidalia Project)</p>
<p>(Note: I only installed the Vidalia Project on Windows 7 so I can&#8217;t speak for the experience on other versions of Windows, Apple OS X &#038; Linux/Unix)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveunderwood.com/2011-08-10/anonymise-your-internet-browsing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interesting answer to an interesting question</title>
		<link>http://daveunderwood.com/2010-05-20/an-interesting-answer-to-an-interesting-question/</link>
		<comments>http://daveunderwood.com/2010-05-20/an-interesting-answer-to-an-interesting-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 05:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Underwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[future trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliot Schrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveunderwood.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: &#8220;It used to be that I could limit what strangers saw about me to almost nothing. I could not show my profile picture, not allow them to “poke” or message me, certainly not allow them to view my profile page. Now, even my interests have to be public information. Why can’t I control my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>Q:</strong> <a href="http://community.nytimes.com/comments/bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/06/ask-facebook-your-privacy-questions/?permid=15#comment15">&#8220;It used to be that I could limit what strangers saw about me to almost nothing. I could not show my profile picture, not allow them to “poke” or message me, certainly not allow them to view my profile page. Now, even my interests have to be public information. Why can’t I control my own information anymore?&#8221;</a></p>
<p><strong>Answer from Elliot Schrage, vice president for public policy at Facebook</strong>: &#8220;Joining Facebook is a conscious choice by vast numbers of people who have stepped forward deliberately and intentionally to connect and share. We study user activity. We’ve found that a few fields of information need to be shared to facilitate the kind of experience people come to Facebook to have. That’s why we require the following fields to be public: name, profile photo (if people choose to have one), gender, connections (again, if people choose to make them), and user ID number. Facebook provides a less satisfying experience for people who choose not to post a photo or make connections with friends or interests. But, other than name and gender, nothing requires them to complete these fields or share information they do not want to share. If you’re not comfortable sharing, don’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/facebook-executive-answers-reader-questions/">Facebook Executive Answers Reader Questions</a> [nytimes.com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveunderwood.com/2010-05-20/an-interesting-answer-to-an-interesting-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

